Nobel Laureates

1970.  Paul Samuelson  http://course.earthrightsinstitute.org/?q=node/81#George

1976.  Milton Friedman  http://course.earthrightsinstitute.org/?q=node/81#George

1978.  Herbert Simon  http://savingcommunities.org/docs/simon.herbert/lvtendorsement.html

1981.  James Tobin   https://www.prosper.org.au/geoists-in-history/james-tobin/

1985.  Franco Modigliani  http://www.wealthandwant.com/themes/quotable_nobels.htm

1986.  James Buchanan  http://www.wealthandwant.com/themes/quotable_nobels.htm

1987.  Robert Solow  http://www.wealthandwant.com/themes/quotable_nobels.htm

1996.  William Vickrey  http://www.wealthandwant.com/themes/quotable_nobels.htm

1996.  James Mirrlees:  Mirrlees Review, ‘Tax by Design’, p.373  https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/mirrleesreview/design/ch16.pdf

2001.  Joseph Stiglitz  https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2019/04/henry-georges-single-tax-could-combat-inequality/587197/

Explanation Part 3

FURTHER ITEMS ON PARTICULAR ASPECTS OF LVT:

  1.   The Causes of Land Value.
  2.   Ownership of Land
  3.   Resource Rents.
  4.   Industrial Land Values.
  5.   Agricultural Land Values.
  6.   Unimproved Land Values.
  7.   Winners and Losers.
  8.   Getting on the Property Ladder.
  9.   Affordable Housing.
  10.   Land Banking.
  11.   Other Economic Rent Collection Methods.
  12.   Typical Objections.
  13.   Obstacles to Introducing LVT.
  14.   The Single Tax Issue.
  15.   Which Taxes?
  16.   Welfare
  17.   Definitions.
  18.   Quotations.

01. Causes of Land Value

In Part 2 the relationship between land values and location was shown to be fundamental, but within that context it is worth noting how land in general or sites in particular may acquire value.  The primary causes affecting land value are:                                                                                     1.  Natural advantages.     2. Infrastructure.    3. Population Intensity    4. The Planning System     5. Security.

Continue reading

02. Ownership of Land

The exercise of power in economic affairs invariably derives from ownership; whoever owns an enterprise or organisation will decide on the laws and procedures that govern it. Whoever owns the elements of production will set the conditions that lead to that production. This applies particularly to land, which is one of the two original elements of wealth creation, the other being labour.                     Continue reading

03. Resource Rents

Amongst economists it is generally understood that the term ‘land’ includes all natural resources, all gifts of nature, natural forests, wildlife, minerals in the ground, fish in the sea etc.   This definition raises the question of ownership, exploitation rights and also the concept of  resource rents.  Justice Cranston’s ruling could apply equally to all natural resources.                              Continue reading

04. Industrial Land Values

In the explanations of Part 2, you may wonder why there is no mention of industrial land?  This is because there is a big distinction to be made between ‘heavy’ and ‘light’ industry.  For the purpose of the Part 2 explanation, light-industrial land comes under the heading of ‘commercial’.  Heavy-industrial land is somewhat anomalous in that, where land values are concerned, it does not follow the same pattern of development as for other forms of economic activity.                                   Continue reading

05. Agricultural Land Values

In the explanation of Part 2, it can be seen that LVT is predominantly an urban rather than a rural tax, in the sense that by far the greater revenue would be derived from the former. Although rural land accounts for about 87% of Britain’s total land area, it represents only about 5% of the total land value.1    Continue reading

06. Unimproved Land Values

The term ‘unimproved land value’ is widely employed in much writing on LVT, but can be misleading. What is intended is to make the distinction between a site that has been developed or built upon (improved) and a vacant site where no apparent development has taken place (unimproved).  The problem with this term is that it leaves unresolved various anomalies that might arise when trying to establish the actual meaning of ‘unimproved’ for the purposes of taxation.             Continue reading

07. Winners and Losers

Politicians are always averse to any change in taxation that will create losers who will cost them votes, so they tend to resort to indirect taxes where no obviously disadvantaged group can be identified. Although any change to LVT would create winners and losers, in any part of the economy where land was involved, it is arguably the effect on homeowners that would give politicians most concern.      Continue reading

08. Getting on the Property Ladder

This expression arose from the time when ordinary homeowners realised that their home did not have value simply as somewhere to live, but also as an investment. It became evident that constantly increasing property values, reflected in house prices, provided, over the long term, a better return on capital than savings accounts, and at the same time a place to live. Paying rent when you could be paying off a mortgage did not make sense to most people.                       Continue reading